This is a co-post between The POCUS Atlas and The Original Kings of County. We shared our images and overlaid color for a comprehensive review of anatomy and how to perform point-of-care ultrasound for appendicitis.
Author: Dr. Miguel Martinez Romo, with contributions from Dr. Roshanak Benabbas; Images: Dr. Sathya Subramanian, Editing/Colorizing by Dr. Matthew Riscinti; Editing: Dr. Ian deSouza, Dr. John Kilpatrick, Dr. Randi Ozaki
Appendicitis is a surgical emergency commonly encountered in the emergency department. In a patient with undifferentiated right lower quadrant pain, appendicitis is often at the top of the differential or is a diagnosis that the provider often feels has to be “ruled-out”. Ultrasonography has emerged as a tool to aid in the diagnosis of appendicitis while also reducing radiation exposure, particularly in children.
…But how accurate is point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) at diagnosing acute appendicitis
In a systematic review and meta-analysis of four studies including 461 pediatric patients, POCUS by emergency physicians had 86% sensitivity and 91% specificity. The positive and negative Likelihood Ratios (LR) were 9.24 and 0.17, respectively. All included studies were prospective and were moderate to high quality (1).
Using this data, POCUS can diagnose acute appendicitis, without the need for radiologist-performed ultrasound, CT, or MRI. However, if POCUS is equivocal or negative, appendicitis cannot be ruled out without further studies.(1)
Probe Marker:
High Frequency Linear Probe
Low Frequency Curvilinear Probe
In pediatrics and thin adults, the linear probe will work most of the time. In those with larger habitus, it may be difficult to visualize the appendix and landmarks. Here you should use a lower-frequency probe, such as the curvilinear or phased-array, to gain adequate depth.
Point-of-Maximal Tenderness Technique: 5. Measure the appendix and compress. A normal appendix is < 6 mm in diameter (<6 to 7 mm described in some literature for pediatrics) from outer wall to outer wall and compressible.(2) In a non-cooperative child (or adult) who is in pain, consider analgesia before starting and distraction, such as with entertaining videos with a smartphone.(3) For a short video summarizing the point of maximal tenderness technique and also introducing the “mini-lawnmower” technique, check out: http://5minsono.com/Appy/ Findings in Appendicitis (2) Abnormal appendix in long view, measuring 8 mm in diameter Abnormal appendix measuring 8 mm in diameter in transverse view surrounded by free fluid, consistent with appendicitis. Note that the literature usually uses a cut-off of 6 to 7 mm; however, infants may have a smaller diameter, with growth of the appendix reported at ages 3 to 6 years. This highlights the need to look for secondary findings of appendicitis, especially in pediatric patients who may have a normal appendiceal diameter. (3) Secondary Findings(2) 2. Fluid surrounding the appendix appearing as hypoechoic material, representing edema or perforation 3. Increased vascularity visualized using color-flow Doppler 4. Wall thickness > 3 mm 5. Target Sign: hypoechoic center (fluid) surrounded by hyperechoic ring (mucosa/submucosa),surrounded by hypoechoic ring in axial view 6. Increased echogenicity of adjacent periappendiceal fat/omentum(4) 7. Enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes 8. Thickening and hyperechogenicity of overlying peritoneum 9. Dilated, hypoactive small bowel 10. Thickening of apical cecal pole or adjacent small bowel So, you’re still having a hard time finding the appendix? Don’t worry you aren’t the only one. Here are a few other techniques for you to try on your patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. The following systematic approach has been described by Sivitz (5): 4,5. With the psoas muscle and iliac vessels kept in view, move the transducer down into the pelvis and toward the umbilicus at the border of the cecum Troubleshooting What if you still cannot visualize the appendix? Perhaps the appendix is retrocecal. In one study(6) visualization of the appendix was improved 21.5% by following a 3-step technique. To visualize the LPO position: http://radtechsociety.blogspot.com/2012/11/anatomical-body-positions.html Another troubleshooting technique is to place the left hand dorsally to the RLQ (essentially placing the hand on the patient’s back). The user then pushes against the patient’s back with anterior and anteromedial pressure with the 4 fingers of the hand; this technique improved visualization by 10% in one study.(7) So what does all of this this mean for us in the ED? You’ll never know if you don’t try! Go ahead and put that probe on the abdomen and try to evaluate for appendicitis. You won’t find it or hone in on your skills unless you give it a shot. If you see findings concerning for appendicitis, this can further support a clinical picture for appendicitis. However, do not utilize POCUS alone as a rule-out and instead consider your other resources available to you, such as serial abdominal exams, CT, MRI, and comprehensive ultrasonography by your radiology department. References:
mmartinez
Latest posts by mmartinez (see all)
0 Comments