We had two heavyweight stabs at the case this month, and right off the bat I will tell you that it is not possible to be 100% certain of any diagnosis in this patient based on the info given. However, this case was presented to highlight a severe pathology that can be missed in the ED if we do not cast a wide differential list. Appropriately, Dr. Kim and Dr. Abram had very broad and diverse differential diagnoses and each hit on many of the illnesses that should be considered, but I have to give the win this month to Dr. Abram for slipping in a recommendation in her workup which would diagnose the condition I wanted to highlight.
In summary: A 72 y/o M is brought in for progressively worsening AMS after a viral URI two months ago. He is in sinus tachycardia, with fever, unsteady gait, and labs largely showing hypernatremia and hypercalcemia with mild transaminitis. Urine studies negative, CXR clear, CT Head hydrocephalus from volume loss. To see the original post, check it out here: http://blog.clinicalmonster.com/2015/09/case-of-the-month-4-presentation/
All That Is SIRS Is Not Sepsis
This patient clearly meets SIRS criteria (temp and HR) but barring infection in the CSF we would be admitting him with a diagnosis of SIRS. At this moment, we need to start thinking of non-infectious causes of SIRS, especially the ones we can diagnose in the ED. A very small list of non-infectious causes of SIRS that could be present in this patient include:
-
Adrenal insufficiency
-
Autoimmune disorders
-
Dehydration
-
Drug reaction
-
Malignancy/Paraneoplastic syndrome
-
Medication side effect
-
Myocardial infarction
-
Pancreatitis
-
Seizures (partial and/or complex)
-
Substance abuse
- Thyroid disease
-
Toxic ingestion
- TTP-HUS
-
Vasculitis
So what is the can't-miss diagnosis to consider in this patient?
A score over 25 makes thyrotoxicosis possible and greater than 45 probable. Our patient gets 10 points for his temperature, 20 points for his mental status, 20 points his HR, and possibly 10 points for precipitant history if you highly suspect his viral URI two months ago as the catalyst. His temperature was also not indicated as oral vs. rectal, and if his 100.8 was orally then a rectal temp might come back even higher, prompting a higher score. Either way, he gets at least 50 points and thyroid storm should be considered. Note how there are still many other diagnoses which could cause this patient to get a high Burch-Wartofsky score. The point of this scoring system is not to make a diagnosis, but rather to guide your clinical judgement on whether or not it could be present. By calculating a score for this patient, it could prompt us to send thyroid function studies from the ED and possible diagnose this critical illness. Think of the flip-side: if we don’t consider this non-infectious causes of SIRS, we could be admitting patients with thyroid storm to the floor for antibiotic therapy for “suspected sepsis”, potentially anchoring this diagnosis and delaying the diagnosis until there is clinical deterioration.
What would management be if this was the diagnosis?
Take Home Points
- Any patient with SIRS who does not produce a source of infection after initial workup may have a non-infectious cause for their symptoms and those processes should at least be considered
- Fever and AMS are regularly implicated in thyroid storm and a patient with these symptoms should prompt a consideration to send thyroid levels
- Thyroid storm is a can’t-miss potentially fatal illness which can be diagnosed clinically in the ED, but due to symptom overlap with other illnesses you can only diagnose it if you are thinking about it!
References:
- Kaplan LJ. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. Emedicine article. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/168943-overview#a5
- De Groot LJ, Bartalena L. Thyroid storm. Endotext. April 12, 2015. www.endotext.org
- Carroll R, Matfin G. Endocrine and metabolic emergencies: thyroid storm. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jun; 1(3): 139–145
James Hassel
Latest posts by James Hassel (see all)
- Case Of the Month 11 – Answer - June 28, 2016
- Case of the Month 11 – Presentation - June 5, 2016
- Case Of the Month 10 – Answer - May 12, 2016
1 Comment
Anonymous · September 18, 2015 at 9:36 pm
Great case! Definitely important to think about, and now thanks to this case I will be sure to keep it on the radar.