Author: Nicole Anthony, MD
Aortic dissections are difficult to diagnose in a timely manner for a variety of reasons, chief among those being the variability in presenting symptoms from one patient to the next: “I have chest pain, and my right side doesn’t work” or “I have abdominal cramping and my foot is cold.” This “vague symptomatology” becomes not so vague or surprising if you familiarize yourself with the anatomy of the aortic dissection and the many malperfusion syndromes that complicate up to 20-30% of all aortic dissections.[1]
There is a common paradigm in emergency medicine regarding aortic dissections known as “chest pain plus…”–that patients with chest pain complicated by another (often seemingly unrelated) complaint, such as chest pain PLUS arm weakness, should raise your index of suspicion for aortic dissection. The following post will elucidate the pathophysiology of the “plus” symptoms one can expect to see in complicated aortic dissections.
Without further ado, let’s discuss the many malperfusion syndromes that you can expect to see as a result of aortic dissection.
Cerebral Malperfusion
Incidence: 6-14% of Type A Aortic Dissections (TAAD)[5]
Mechanism:
– Occlusion of arch vessels (either brachiocephalic artery or left carotid) by dissection flap
– False lumen thrombus embolizing to the brain
– Hypoperfusion event as a result of profound hypotension or cardiac tamponade
Myocardial Malperfusion Syndrome
Incidence: 10-15% of TAAD[5]
Mechanism:
– Coronary artery occlusion by dissection flap or extension
– Coronary artery disruption
Right Coronary Artery Involvement
There are three mechanisms by which coronary artery involvement can result in coronary malperfusion: obstruction of the coronary artery by the dissection flap, extension of the dissection into the coronary artery (as pictured below), and coronary artery disruption (or rupture).
In a retrospective study at a single, tertiary care hospital, only five patients out of 159 patients (3.1%) with acute type A aortic dissections were found to have involvement of the RCA. All five of those patients, however, followed the predictable pattern of RCA malperfusion/occlusion with ST-segment elevations in II, III, and aVF, making it easily mistakable for an OMI.[7] Although the sample size was quite small, this ECG pattern has been observed in numerous other case reports of aortic dissections with RCA involvement.[8-11]
Left Coronary Artery Involvement
Dissections with left coronary involvement are less likely, and although they also tend to show ST-elevations on ECG, they are less predictable than RCA occlusions in their pattern.[7,13]
Special Cases
Cardiac tamponade
Incidence: 20-36% of TAAD[14]
Mechanism:
– Rupture of adventitia in the ascending aortic artery
– Cardiac rupture
Mechanism: Dilation of the aortic root
Renal Malperfusion
Incidence: Approximately 8% of all aortic dissections[18,19]
Mechanism:
– Dissection into the renal artery
– Occlusion of vessel by dissection flap
– Thrombus
– Compression of the left renal vein by the enlarged aorta (“Nutcracker Syndrome”)
Symptoms and signs of renal artery involvement include flank pain and hematuria. In a patient with known renal artery involvement, keep a high index of suspicion for renal malperfusion, especially in the context of worsening kidney function or progressively uncontrolled hypertension.
Mesenteric Malperfusion
Incidence: 4-6% of all aortic dissections[5,21]
Mechanism:
– Occlusion of Celiac and Mesenteric Arteries by the dissection flap[22]
– Thrombus in false lumen
– Dissection into the Celiac and/or Mesenteric Arteries
The most common symptoms of malperfusion due to aortic dissection include abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea; however, up to 40% of patients with this malperfusion syndrome do not have any abdominal pain. This is especially concerning when considering that mesenteric malperfusion is a strong predictor of mortality with up to two-thirds of patients dying during hospitalization.[5]
Spinal Malperfusion
Incidence: 4% of all aortic dissections[23]
Mechanism:
– Radiculolumbar arteries originating in the false lumen. The anterior cord at the T10-T12 level (Artery of Adamkiewisz) is a watershed area and most often involved[24]
– Thrombosis
– Hypoperfusion event as a result of profound hypotension
Spinal malperfusion is one of the least common malperfusion syndromes that complicates aortic dissection and can present with varying severity, ranging from decreased motor strength to complete limb paralysis, urinary retention, and paresthesias. Painless motor deficits occur in less than 1% of aortic dissections.[26] The spinal cord is more sensitive to sudden changes in perfusion pressures and thus, neurological symptoms may precede “typical” symptoms of aortic dissection.
Limb Malperfusion
Limb ischemia secondary to aortic dissection typically presents with pain, signs of decreased perfusion, paresthesias, and/or weakness. The lower extremities are more often involved than the upper extremities.[28] In over half of cases with lower limb ischemia due to aortic dissection, both lower extremities are involved.[29] Pulse deficits are only 30% sensitive in detecting thoracic aortic dissection and should not be used to rule out dissection.[30]
Upper Limb Ischemia
Incidence: 1-4% of TAAD and more likely to involve the right rather than the left upper extremity[28]
Mechanism:
– Obstruction of vessel by flap
– Thrombosis
– Decreased flow due to blood supply from false lumen
Lower Limb Ischemia
Incidence: 4-23% of TAAD[19,28] and 6% of Type B dissections[32]
Mechanism:
– Obstruction of iliac artery or aortic obstruction by dissection flap
– Thrombosis
– Decreased flow due to origination of artery in false lumen
Final Words
– Consider aortic dissection in “chest pain + ____” patients.
– Physical exam findings (such as weakness and pulse deficits) can be waxing and waning.
– Malperfusion syndromes complicate 25-30% of all aortic dissections.
– Symptoms of malperfusion syndromes can overlap and more than one major vascular bed can be involved.
– Although type B dissections are typically managed non-operatively, the presence of a concurrent malperfusion syndrome warrants evaluation for operative management.
Extra
– EM:RAP’s March 2021 Aortic Dissection Update
– Features of acute vs chronic dissection on CT
– Hounsfield units as a means to spot extravasation on CT
– Case-based learning from presentation to management
– The utility of d-dimers in the diagnosis of aortic dissection
References
8. Wu BT, Li CY, Chen YT. Type A Aortic Dissection Presenting with Inferior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2014;30(3):248-252
14. Hirata K. Acute Aortic Dissection: A Rare but Important Cause of Acute Pericarditis. American College of Cardiology. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2020/09/14/09/08/acute-aortic-dissection. Published September 14, 2020. Accessed July 20, 2021.
25. Moore DW. Spinal Cord Monitoring. Orthobullets. https://www.orthobullets.com/spine/9023/spinal-cord-monitoring. Published June 23, 2021. Accessed July 20, 2021.
nicanthony
Latest posts by nicanthony (see all)
- Abortion Care in the ED - May 23, 2023
- DNR Orders in the Suicidal Patient - September 22, 2022
- Sono of the Week: Neck Swelling - August 2, 2022
0 Comments